Many bettors use “Progressive Staking Systems” to manage their bankroll. Instead of betting the same amount every time (Flat Betting), they adjust their stakes based on whether the previous bet won or lost.
This simulator runs a 10-step trial of the three most popular alternative systems: Fibonacci, D’Alembert, and Paroli.
The Systems Explained
1. Fibonacci (The Recovery System)
Logic: Increase stakes after a loss following the Fibonacci sequence (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8…). Step back two numbers after a win.
- Goal: To recover losses from previous bets with a single win at higher stakes.
- Risk: Requires a deep bankroll if you hit a long losing streak.
2. D’Alembert (The Even Money Grind)
Logic: Increase stake by 1 unit after a loss. Decrease by 1 unit after a win.
- Goal: To profit if you win roughly 50% of your bets, even if you have slightly more losses than wins.
- Risk: Lower risk than Martingale, but recovery is slower.
3. Paroli (Positive Progression)
Logic: Double your bet after a Win. Reset to base stake after a loss or after 3 consecutive wins.
- Goal: To capitalize on “Hot Streaks” while risking only the casino’s money (your winnings).
- Risk: You win frequently but small amounts; you lose infrequently but give back profits if the streak ends early.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Do these systems beat the bookie?
No. Staking systems change the distribution of your wins and losses (volatility), but they do not change the Expected Value (EV) of the bets themselves. If you are betting on negative EV outcomes, no system will make you profitable in the long run.